← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MOONEY DITCH 1 AND 2 HG

Structure dossier · WDID 4300781 · 1 · PICEANCE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:13 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1898-04-10993rd most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: FORNEY CORCORAN DITCH (1898-03-15). Immediately behind: MOONEY DITCH 1 (1898-04-10).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
32172.176321898-04-101942-05-26 0.00.0 CIRR 380
32172.245921917-05-011942-05-26 0.00.0 CIRR 467K

Recorded use (last 11 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 178 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2018, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2005 286 9th lowest of 11 · 161% of median 89 2.0
2007 23 4th lowest of 11 · 13% of median 24 0.5
2008 190 7th lowest of 11 · 107% of median 144 0.9
2009 102 5th lowest of 11 · 57% of median 80 1.5
2010 222 8th lowest of 11 · 125% of median 118 1.7
2011 290 10th lowest of 11 · 163% of median 69 3.2
2013 18 3rd lowest of 11 · 10% of median 30 0.5
2014 178 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 30 3.1
2015 323 11th lowest of 11 · 182% of median 167 1.0
2016 0 1st lowest of 11 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2018 0 1st lowest of 11 · 0% of median 1 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 2 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 754 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 27% of the irrigation seasons in 2005-2018 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.