← My Water · Print / save as PDF
NIBLOCK DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4300842 · 1 · WHITE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:48 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1885-03-08 — 23rd most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SQUARE S CONS D ALT PT (1884-12-03). Immediately behind: SCHUTTE DITCH (1885-04-01).
Decreed rights (10)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12851.0 | 1885-03-08 | 1889-05-10 | 2.4 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 17 |
| 13620.0 | 1887-04-16 | 1889-05-10 | 5.4 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 66 |
| 17417.14183 | 1888-10-30 | 1897-09-10 | 24.8 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 108A |
| 32172.14762 | 1890-06-01 | 1942-05-26 | 29.28 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 351 |
| 40715.0 | 1961-06-22 | 1966-11-21 | 0.6 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 693 |
| 41059.0 | 1962-06-01 | 1966-11-21 | 1.35 | 0.0 | C | IRRSTK | 712 |
| 41443.0 | 1963-06-20 | 1966-11-21 | 5.15 | 0.0 | C | IRRSTK | 729 |
| 46386.41443 | 1963-06-20 | 1977-12-31 | 14.02 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 46750.0 | 1977-12-30 | 1977-12-31 | 16.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 61945.0 | 2019-08-07 | 1977-12-31 | 0.0 | 3.0 | C | OTH |
Legal record & documents
15 decreed actions on record across
10 court cases:
W3661-77, 96CW0222, 19CW3036, 10CW0025, W0717-72, W0605-72, CA1269, CA0624, 09/10/1897, CA0133.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
W3661-77 | 2 | 1977-12-31 | S |
96CW0222 | 1 | 1977-12-31 | S |
19CW3036 | 1 | 1977-12-31 | S |
10CW0025 | 1 | 1977-12-31 | S |
W0717-72 | 1 | 1966-11-21 | S |
W0605-72 | 1 | 1966-11-21 | S |
CA1269 | 3 | 1966-11-21 | S |
CA0624 | 1 | 1942-05-26 | S |
09/10/1897 | 2 | 1897-09-10 | S |
CA0133 | 2 | 1889-05-10 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 15,933 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 18,479 AF — 116% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 14,123 | 4th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | 195 | 90.0 |
| 2012 | 18,671 | 13th lowest of 15 · 117% of median | 208 | 92.0 |
| 2013 | 16,059 | 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median | 229 | 93.0 |
| 2014 | 25,571 | 15th lowest of 15 · 160% of median | 272 | 89.7 |
| 2015 | 14,872 | 5th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 174 | 96.7 |
| 2016 | 15,223 | 6th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | 190 | 95.5 |
| 2017 | 17,862 | 11th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 168 | 84.2 |
| 2018 | 8,640 | 1st lowest of 15 · 54% of median | 51 | 87.1 |
| 2019 | 15,933 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 136 | 90.9 |
| 2020 | 20,559 | 14th lowest of 15 · 129% of median | 178 | 95.1 |
| 2021 | 15,379 | 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | 182 | 82.3 |
| 2022 | 16,450 | 10th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 181 | 82.3 |
| 2023 | 10,880 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 68% of median | 164 | 75.1 |
| 2024 | 13,881 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 87% of median | 176 | 75.1 |
| 2025 | 18,479 | 12th lowest of 15 · 116% of median | 176 | 83.0 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 10 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 13303 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | continuous | 82% of the irrigation seasons in 1950-2025 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.