Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
NIMERICK DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4300844 · 1 · NORTH FORK WHITE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:05 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1889-09-24 — 123rd most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HUTCHINSON SPRING DITCH (1889-07-18). Immediately behind: POTHOLE DITCH (1889-09-24).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14512.0 | 1889-09-24 | 1889-05-10 | 4.8 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 113 |
Legal record & documents
1 decreed actions on record across
1 court case:
CA0624.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA0624 | 1 | 1889-05-10 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 526 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2008, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1974 | 781 | 11th lowest of 15 · 148% of median | 68 | 8.0 |
| 1975 | 871 | 13th lowest of 15 · 166% of median | 82 | 8.0 |
| 1976 | 1,081 | 14th lowest of 15 · 206% of median | 119 | 6.0 |
| 1977 | 436 | 7th lowest of 15 · 83% of median | 49 | 5.0 |
| 1979 | 809 | 12th lowest of 15 · 154% of median | 92 | 6.0 |
| 1980 | 1,186 | 15th lowest of 15 · 226% of median | 112 | 6.0 |
| 1981 | 571 | 9th lowest of 15 · 109% of median | 46 | 8.0 |
| 1982 | 526 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 61 | 5.0 |
| 1983 | 83 | 4th lowest of 15 · 16% of median | 21 | 3.0 |
| 1984 | 250 | 5th lowest of 15 · 48% of median | 48 | 3.0 |
| 1985 | 744 | 10th lowest of 15 · 141% of median | 77 | 5.0 |
| 1986 | 349 | 6th lowest of 15 · 66% of median | 52 | 4.0 |
| 2006 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2007 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 3 | 0.0 |
| 2008 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 10 | 0.0 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use is falling over its last 15 recorded years (-28 AF/yr, Mann-Kendall p=0.002).
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 2105 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 22% of the irrigation seasons in 1964-2008 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.