Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

SPRING CREEK D PUMP 1

Structure dossier · WDID 4300939 · 8 · WHITE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:05 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1941-05-10 — 1113th most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BRUCE BAKER DITCH (1940-09-01). Immediately behind: SPRING CREEK D PUMP 2 (1941-05-10).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
35679.333671941-05-101958-11-26 5.20.0 CIRR 537, 552

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 125 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2022, came in at 160 AF — 128% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2003 180 10th lowest of 15 · 144% of median 49 3.0
2004 202 11th lowest of 15 · 162% of median 114 1.0
2005 208 13th lowest of 15 · 166% of median 118 1.0
2006 109 7th lowest of 15 · 87% of median 125 0.5
2007 55 4th lowest of 15 · 44% of median 118 0.2
2008 90 6th lowest of 15 · 72% of median 184 0.2
2009 65 5th lowest of 15 · 52% of median 143 0.2
2010 53 3rd lowest of 15 · 42% of median 119 0.2
2011 202 11th lowest of 15 · 162% of median 39 3.0
2012 125 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 23 3.0
2013 238 14th lowest of 15 · 190% of median 51 3.0
2015 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2016 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2020 281 15th lowest of 15 · 225% of median 58 2.7
2022 160 9th lowest of 15 · 128% of median 125 0.7

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.