← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

GARDENHEIR DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4301030 · 1 · PICEANCE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:19 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1895-03-05985th most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WEST STEWART GULCH RES (1895-03-02). Immediately behind: KING D 1 AND 2 HG ALT 1 (1896-05-01).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
32172.1651895-03-051942-05-26 0.610.0 CIRR 368
32172.245921917-05-011942-05-26 1.430.0 CIRR 467-Z6

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 151 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 203 AF — 134% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 664 14th lowest of 15 · 440% of median 142 4.0
2012 105 7th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 42 2.2
2013 24 2nd lowest of 15 · 16% of median 25 1.0
2014 89 6th lowest of 15 · 59% of median 28 2.0
2015 530 11th lowest of 15 · 351% of median 177 1.6
2016 151 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 31 2.6
2017 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 4 0.0
2018 81 5th lowest of 15 · 54% of median 29 1.5
2019 562 12th lowest of 15 · 372% of median 149 2.0
2020 154 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 35 3.0
2021 49 4th lowest of 15 · 32% of median 25 1.5
2022 27 3rd lowest of 15 · 18% of median 12 1.5
2023 1,024 15th lowest of 15 · 678% of median 81 6.8
2024 611 13th lowest of 15 · 405% of median 145 3.6
2025 203 10th lowest of 15 · 134% of median 70 1.5

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.