Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

FRANK & EVALON HUFF D 1

Structure dossier · WDID 4302056 · 1 · DOUGAN DRAW · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:23 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1904-06-07 — 1631st most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: FRANKLIN SPG NO 1 (1902-12-31). Immediately behind: JOHN A STORY D NO 3 (1904-06-07).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
45290.198811904-06-071974-12-31 1.00.0 CIRRDOM

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 18 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2018, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2003 46 13th lowest of 15 · 256% of median 29 1.0
2004 90 15th lowest of 15 · 500% of median 59 1.0
2005 26 10th lowest of 15 · 144% of median 26 1.0
2006 32 11th lowest of 15 · 178% of median 27 1.0
2007 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 12 0.0
2008 35 12th lowest of 15 · 194% of median 32 1.0
2009 6 5th lowest of 15 · 33% of median 22 0.2
2010 18 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 17 1.0
2011 18 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 19 1.0
2012 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 11 0.0
2013 49 14th lowest of 15 · 272% of median 48 0.8
2014 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 6 0.0
2016 8 6th lowest of 15 · 44% of median 21 0.2
2017 14 7th lowest of 15 · 78% of median 48 0.2
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1829 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 28% of the irrigation seasons in 1988-2018 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.