← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

L K CANAL

Structure dossier · WDID 4302106 · 1 · WHITE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:40 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1946-12-311743rd most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BROWN PALACE SPG (1945-06-15). Immediately behind: BEAVER SPG (1950-12-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
45655.354281946-12-311975-12-31 2.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 266 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 769 AF — 289% of that, and 14th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2007 327 9th lowest of 15 · 123% of median 140 2.0
2008 257 7th lowest of 15 · 97% of median 152 2.0
2009 266 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 147 2.0
2010 368 11th lowest of 15 · 138% of median 163 2.0
2011 217 6th lowest of 15 · 82% of median 158 2.2
2012 357 10th lowest of 15 · 134% of median 168 2.0
2013 190 5th lowest of 15 · 71% of median 148 2.0
2014 484 13th lowest of 15 · 182% of median 126 2.0
2016 404 12th lowest of 15 · 152% of median 164 1.5
2018 132 2nd lowest of 15 · 50% of median 40 1.7
2020 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2021 1,555 15th lowest of 15 · 585% of median 119 9.8
2022 147 3rd lowest of 15 · 55% of median 56 1.8
2023 175 4th lowest of 15 · 66% of median 49 2.0
2024 769 14th lowest of 15 · 289% of median 156 2.5

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3734 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 42% of the irrigation seasons in 1983-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.