← My Water · Print / save as PDF
8 F DITCH NO 1
Structure dossier · WDID 4400521 · 1 · EAST FORK WILLIAMS FORK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 19:16 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1885-05-01 — 18th most senior of the 3562 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HULETT & TORRENCE D (1885-03-01). Immediately behind: NORVELL DITCH (1885-05-14).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12905.0 | 1885-05-01 | 1894-09-22 | 1.33 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 13 |
| 40421.28624 | 1928-05-15 | 1972-05-30 | 2.67 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 10A |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 127 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 481 AF — 379% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 24 | 6th lowest of 15 · 19% of median | 7 | 2.0 |
| 2006 | 238 | 9th lowest of 15 · 187% of median | 31 | 4.0 |
| 2007 | 516 | 13th lowest of 15 · 406% of median | 88 | 4.0 |
| 2010 | 127 | 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 17 | 4.0 |
| 2011 | 127 | 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 41 | 2.0 |
| 2012 | 409 | 11th lowest of 15 · 322% of median | 93 | 4.0 |
| 2013 | 547 | 14th lowest of 15 · 431% of median | 97 | 4.0 |
| 2014 | 256 | 10th lowest of 15 · 202% of median | 88 | 2.0 |
| 2015 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 2016 | 563 | 15th lowest of 15 · 443% of median | 72 | 4.0 |
| 2018 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2020 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 2022 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2024 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2025 | 481 | 12th lowest of 15 · 379% of median | 94 | 4.6 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.