← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BEARDSLEE DITCH NO1

Structure dossier · WDID 4400544 · 1 · PARASITE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:06 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1895-07-28210th most senior of the 3562 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SAUNDERS DITCH (1894-05-04). Immediately behind: BEARDSLEE DITCH NO 2 AKA A FRAME (1895-08-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
19250.166451895-07-281902-09-18 1.670.0 CIRR 74

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 136 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 342 AF — 252% of that, and 15th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2008 177 12th lowest of 15 · 130% of median 91 1.0
2009 151 11th lowest of 15 · 111% of median 78 1.0
2010 183 13th lowest of 15 · 135% of median 119 1.5
2011 136 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 93 1.0
2012 138 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 104 1.0
2013 241 14th lowest of 15 · 177% of median 115 1.5
2014 121 7th lowest of 15 · 89% of median 62 1.0
2015 73 3rd lowest of 15 · 54% of median 59 1.0
2016 142 10th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 142 1.0
2017 94 4th lowest of 15 · 69% of median 74 0.6
2018 102 5th lowest of 15 · 75% of median 115 0.4
2020 42 1st lowest of 15 · 31% of median 14 1.6
2023 56 2nd lowest of 15 · 41% of median 72 0.4
2024 112 6th lowest of 15 · 82% of median 151 0.6
2025 342 15th lowest of 15 · 252% of median 146 1.6

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.