← My Water · Print / save as PDF
D D FERGUSON D NO 2
Structure dossier · WDID 4400587 · 1 · MILK CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:21 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1890-06-28 — 146th most senior of the 3562 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: J W KELLOGG D 2 (1892-03-30). Immediately behind: HIGHLINE MESA BAKER D (1889-11-18).
Decreed rights (5)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16699.14789 | 1890-06-28 | 1897-09-21 | 3.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 61 |
| 18529.17723 | 1898-07-10 | 1902-09-15 | 3.33 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 94 |
| 36295.21397 | 1908-08-01 | 1960-09-01 | 4.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 18 |
| 36295.29219 | 1929-12-31 | 1960-09-01 | 3.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 45 |
| 36295.3275 | 1939-09-01 | 1960-09-01 | 3.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 48 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 991 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 223 AF — 22% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1,843 | 15th lowest of 15 · 186% of median | 116 | 20.0 |
| 2012 | 688 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 69% of median | 58 | 15.2 |
| 2013 | 884 | 5th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | 40 | 16.5 |
| 2014 | 1,030 | 9th lowest of 15 · 104% of median | 63 | 13.6 |
| 2015 | 982 | 6th lowest of 15 · 99% of median | 58 | 16.5 |
| 2016 | 1,333 | 12th lowest of 15 · 134% of median | 172 | 13.5 |
| 2017 | 1,227 | 10th lowest of 15 · 124% of median | 67 | 16.9 |
| 2018 | 991 | 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 37 | 20.8 |
| 2019 | 991 | 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 37 | 20.8 |
| 2020 | 759 | 4th lowest of 15 · 77% of median | 43 | 13.8 |
| 2021 | 1,274 | 11th lowest of 15 · 129% of median | 50 | 16.2 |
| 2022 | 1,416 | 13th lowest of 15 · 143% of median | 63 | 16.2 |
| 2023 | 1,510 | 14th lowest of 15 · 152% of median | 71 | 25.1 |
| 2024 | 622 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 63% of median | 57 | 13.1 |
| 2025 | 223 | 1st lowest of 15 · 22% of median | 75 | 1.5 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.