← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MCFADDEN DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4400701 · 1 · EAST FORK WILLIAMS FORK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:13 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1897-06-01218th most senior of the 3562 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: RIDER DITCH (1897-05-15). Immediately behind: PAGODA DITCH (1897-10-25).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
19250.173191897-06-011902-09-18 1.340.0 CIRR 84

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 194 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 213 AF — 110% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2009 211 9th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 64 2.0
2010 181 7th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 63 2.0
2011 110 5th lowest of 15 · 57% of median 73 1.5
2012 310 14th lowest of 15 · 160% of median 125 1.5
2013 349 15th lowest of 15 · 180% of median 89 2.0
2014 228 11th lowest of 15 · 118% of median 82 1.5
2015 180 6th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 94 1.0
2016 63 4th lowest of 15 · 32% of median 18 2.0
2017 194 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 85 1.2
2019 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2020 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2021 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2023 256 13th lowest of 15 · 132% of median 62 2.4
2024 244 12th lowest of 15 · 126% of median 93 1.4
2025 213 10th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 61 2.3

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.