← My Water · Print / save as PDF
MILK CREEK DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4400706 · 1 · MILK CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:39 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1888-03-01 — 47th most senior of the 3562 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: D D & E DITCH (1888-03-01). Immediately behind: D D & E DITCH AP 1 (1888-03-01).
Decreed rights (10)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13940.0 | 1888-03-01 | 1894-09-22 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 34 |
| 19253.16005 | 1893-10-26 | 1903-09-21 | 331.0 | 0.0 | A | STOIRRINDAUG | 71A |
| 19253.16005 | 1893-10-26 | 1903-09-21 | 5.33 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRINDAUG | 71A |
| 36295.16005 | 1893-10-26 | 1960-09-01 | 14.67 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 2 |
| 36295.16617 | 1895-06-30 | 1960-09-01 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 3 |
| 36295.22279 | 1910-12-31 | 1960-09-01 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 24 |
| 36295.25932 | 1920-12-31 | 1960-09-01 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 39 |
| 38498.0 | 1955-05-28 | 1960-09-01 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 80A |
| 47481.46533 | 1977-05-27 | 1980-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRINDDOM | |
| 61614.0 | 2018-09-10 | 2018-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRCOMINDFIRDOMAUG |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 428 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2022, came in at 1,936 AF — 452% of that, and 14th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 808 | 13th lowest of 15 · 189% of median | 140 | 5.0 |
| 2002 | 657 | 10th lowest of 15 · 154% of median | 78 | 10.0 |
| 2003 | 710 | 11th lowest of 15 · 166% of median | 141 | 5.0 |
| 2004 | 637 | 9th lowest of 15 · 149% of median | 139 | 5.0 |
| 2005 | 428 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 106 | 3.0 |
| 2006 | 424 | 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median | 143 | 3.0 |
| 2007 | 151 | 4th lowest of 15 · 35% of median | 70 | 2.0 |
| 2008 | 115 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 27% of median | 59 | 1.0 |
| 2009 | 215 | 5th lowest of 15 · 50% of median | 94 | 2.0 |
| 2011 | 91 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 21% of median | 62 | 1.0 |
| 2012 | 356 | 6th lowest of 15 · 83% of median | 170 | 2.0 |
| 2019 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2020 | 719 | 12th lowest of 15 · 168% of median | 126 | 5.6 |
| 2021 | 2,021 | 15th lowest of 15 · 472% of median | 231 | 20.8 |
| 2022 | 1,936 | 14th lowest of 15 · 452% of median | 162 | 27.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.