← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

SILVER WATER PUMP

Structure dossier · WDID 4401397 · 8 · YAMPA RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:03 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1992-12-092386th most senior of the 3562 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SOUTH FK WILLIAMS FK MSF (1992-09-16). Immediately behind: HOMESTEAD POND (1920-07-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
52208.01992-12-091992-12-31 2.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 74 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 196 AF — 265% of that, and 13th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2006 218 14th lowest of 15 · 295% of median 69 2.0
2007 71 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median 47 1.0
2008 12 1st lowest of 15 · 16% of median 9 1.0
2009 20 2nd lowest of 15 · 27% of median 15 1.0
2010 83 10th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 54 1.0
2011 74 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 39 2.0
2012 89 11th lowest of 15 · 120% of median 55 1.6
2013 101 12th lowest of 15 · 136% of median 55 1.8
2014 43 4th lowest of 15 · 58% of median 25 1.4
2015 24 3rd lowest of 15 · 32% of median 19 1.8
2016 56 5th lowest of 15 · 76% of median 33 1.8
2018 74 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 30 1.3
2019 237 15th lowest of 15 · 320% of median 90 1.3
2021 63 6th lowest of 15 · 85% of median 25 1.5
2024 196 13th lowest of 15 · 265% of median 70 1.5

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1748 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 26% of the irrigation seasons in 1994-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.