← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BIG FOUR DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4500525 · 1 · CACHE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:36 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1896-05-19154th most senior of the 1378 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CRANN PIPELINE DITCH (1903-09-14). Immediately behind: GUSTAFSON WASTE WATER D (1893-01-10).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
21513.169411896-05-191908-12-03 0.00.0 CIRR 118BB
23336.219921910-03-191913-11-25 1.80.0 CIRR 143BBA

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 49 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1997, came in at 86 AF — 176% of that, and 8th lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1975 14 3rd lowest of 12 · 29% of median 6 1.8
1978 44 6th lowest of 12 · 90% of median 14 1.8
1979 29 5th lowest of 12 · 59% of median 10 1.8
1980 54 7th lowest of 12 · 110% of median 16 1.8
1983 125 10th lowest of 12 · 255% of median 36 1.8
1984 148 11th lowest of 12 · 302% of median 48 1.8
1985 124 9th lowest of 12 · 253% of median 25 2.6
1986 213 12th lowest of 12 · 435% of median 49 2.6
1987 0 1st lowest of 12 · 0% of median 1 0.0
1995 0 1st lowest of 12 · 0% of median 1 0.0
1996 18 4th lowest of 12 · 37% of median 6 1.8
1997 86 8th lowest of 12 · 176% of median 27 1.8

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 2 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 239 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 5% of the irrigation seasons in 1975-1997 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.