← My Water · Print / save as PDF
HOLMES DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4500632 · 1 · CACHE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:17 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1885-08-02 — 33rd most senior of the 1378 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: TAUGHENBAUGH DITCH (1885-07-28). Immediately behind: TALLMADGE AND GIBSON D (1885-08-14).
Decreed rights (5)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12998.0 | 1885-08-02 | 1888-05-05 | 1.67 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 35 |
| 13327.0 | 1886-06-27 | 1888-05-05 | 3.97 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 57 |
| 19544.12998 | 1885-08-02 | 1903-11-12 | 0.83 | 0.0 | C | DOMSTK | DOM5 |
| 19812.16156 | 1894-03-26 | 1904-04-02 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 117AA |
| 21366.19113 | 1902-05-01 | 1908-11-09 | 2.67 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 125A |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,029 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 1,291 AF — 126% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 1,029 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 283 | 10.6 |
| 2011 | 1,632 | 14th lowest of 15 · 159% of median | 256 | 11.0 |
| 2012 | 686 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 67% of median | 179 | 5.6 |
| 2013 | 934 | 6th lowest of 15 · 91% of median | 266 | 10.3 |
| 2014 | 1,238 | 10th lowest of 15 · 120% of median | 287 | 10.3 |
| 2015 | 1,242 | 11th lowest of 15 · 121% of median | 300 | 10.3 |
| 2016 | 978 | 7th lowest of 15 · 95% of median | 161 | 10.3 |
| 2017 | 866 | 5th lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 216 | 6.7 |
| 2018 | 595 | 1st lowest of 15 · 58% of median | 180 | 5.6 |
| 2019 | 1,737 | 15th lowest of 15 · 169% of median | 288 | 12.0 |
| 2020 | 725 | 4th lowest of 15 · 70% of median | 260 | 5.6 |
| 2021 | 718 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 70% of median | 175 | 5.6 |
| 2022 | 1,500 | 13th lowest of 15 · 146% of median | 365 | 12.6 |
| 2023 | 1,100 | 9th lowest of 15 · 107% of median | 203 | 6.2 |
| 2024 | 1,291 | 12th lowest of 15 · 126% of median | 240 | 10.3 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.