← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MOORE DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4500695 · 1 · GARFIELD CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 03:51 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1881-06-102nd most senior of the 1378 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: GOLDMAN DITCH PUMP & PL (1880-04-01). Immediately behind: MURRAY AND YULE DITCH (1881-06-10).

Decreed rights (20)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
11484.01881-06-101888-05-05 0.00.0 CIRRAUG 1
11854.01882-06-151888-05-05 0.250.0 CIRRAUG 3
12175.01883-05-021888-05-05 0.00.0 CIRRAUG 11
12178.01883-05-051888-05-05 0.00.0 CIRRAUG 12
12205.01883-06-011888-05-05 1.330.0 CIRRAUG 14
12534.01884-04-251888-05-05 0.00.0 CIRRAUG 21
13103.01885-11-151888-05-05 0.00.0 CIRRAUG 43
13294.01886-05-251888-05-05 0.00.0 CIRRAUG 54
13605.01887-04-011888-05-05 0.00.0 CIRRAUG 74
15804.146941890-03-251893-12-20 0.00.0 CIRRAUG 109A
15804.147131890-04-131893-12-20 0.00.0 CIRRAUG 109B
15804.148091890-07-181893-12-20 0.00.0 CIRRAUG 109C
20515.160651893-12-251906-03-06 0.00.0 CIRRAUG 117AAAA
22153.20621906-06-161910-11-14 0.00.0 CIRRAUG 138A
23300.227471912-04-121913-11-10 0.00.0 CIRRAUG 145AA
24052.136411887-05-071916-05-15 0.00.0 CIRRAUG 79A
33007.322621938-05-011941-07-23 0.00.0 CIRRAUG 172I
33099.183831900-05-011941-07-23 0.00.0 CIRRAUG DOM16
33099.308011934-05-011941-07-23 0.00.0 CIRRAUG DOM17
33099.322621938-05-011941-07-23 0.00.0 CIRRAUG 172A, 172B

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 23 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 139 AF — 604% of that, and 15th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2002 8 4th lowest of 15 · 35% of median 6 1.0
2003 102 13th lowest of 15 · 444% of median 48 1.9
2005 23 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 72 0.2
2007 34 9th lowest of 15 · 148% of median 172 0.1
2008 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2009 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2016 4 3rd lowest of 15 · 17% of median 4 61 0.0
2017 76 11th lowest of 15 · 330% of median 18 304 0.3
2018 18 6th lowest of 15 · 78% of median 12 200 0.3
2019 92 12th lowest of 15 · 400% of median 92 200 0.2
2020 16 5th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 16 164 0.1
2021 49 10th lowest of 15 · 213% of median 29 202 0.3
2022 21 7th lowest of 15 · 91% of median 21 214 0.1
2023 109 14th lowest of 15 · 474% of median 106 214 0.3
2024 139 15th lowest of 15 · 604% of median 106 214 0.3

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 20 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 5317 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 50% of the irrigation seasons in 1975-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.