← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

VINAL HAYWARD PIPELINE

Structure dossier · WDID 4500805 · 7 · COLORADO RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 05:24 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1940-07-15296th most senior of the 1378 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ESHE PUMP AND DITCH (1930-05-01). Immediately behind: VALLEY FARMS WELL NO 1 (1945-12-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
34825.330681940-07-151953-03-02 2.50.0 CIRRINDDOM 198

Recorded use (last 7 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 40 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1987, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 7 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1975 153 7th lowest of 7 · 382% of median 34 2.3
1976 75 6th lowest of 7 · 188% of median 20 2.0
1977 48 5th lowest of 7 · 120% of median 13 2.0
1978 40 4th lowest of 7 · 100% of median 11 2.0
1979 7 2nd lowest of 7 · 18% of median 3 1.9
1980 8 3rd lowest of 7 · 20% of median 3 1.9
1987 0 1st lowest of 7 · 0% of median 1 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record fragment 85 measured day(s) on file (under 180 -- a season, not a history)
record continuity unknown record too short to assess continuity (needs 2+ years of span and 180+ measured days)
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.