← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

UPPER HILLS DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4800511 · 1 · LARAMIE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:06 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1887-05-0144th most senior of the 143 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: OLLIE DITCH (1886-07-01). Immediately behind: STUART DITCH (1896-04-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
20737.136351887-05-011914-02-20 10.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 282 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 1,014 AF — 360% of that, and 15th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 353 11th lowest of 15 · 125% of median 62 6.6
2011 310 10th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 52 5.8
2012 235 3rd lowest of 15 · 83% of median 39 5.8
2013 267 6th lowest of 15 · 95% of median 45 6.6
2014 282 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 50 6.6
2015 267 6th lowest of 15 · 95% of median 45 6.6
2016 266 5th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 45 6.6
2017 250 4th lowest of 15 · 89% of median 43 6.0
2018 5 1st lowest of 15 · 2% of median 9 0.4
2019 198 2nd lowest of 15 · 70% of median 52 5.0
2020 294 9th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 41 15.3
2021 727 13th lowest of 15 · 258% of median 55 21.0
2022 739 14th lowest of 15 · 262% of median 48 23.8
2023 531 12th lowest of 15 · 188% of median 34 13.3
2024 1,014 15th lowest of 15 · 360% of median 46 19.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2394 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 22% of the irrigation seasons in 1974-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.