← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

STUART DITCH 2

Structure dossier · WDID 4800540 · 1 · MCINTYRE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:07 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1913-05-2474th most senior of the 143 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: STUBB CREEK DITCH (1911-07-28). Immediately behind: LARAMIE LAKE (1890-06-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
23154.01913-05-241914-02-20 0.029.4 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 644 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2019, came in at 721 AF — 112% of that, and 15th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2000 12 4th lowest of 15 · 2% of median 14 2.3
2001 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2002 9 3rd lowest of 15 · 1% of median 11 0.7
2003 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2009 17 5th lowest of 15 · 3% of median 19 1.9
2010 666 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 65 8.0
2011 644 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 64 8.0
2012 497 7th lowest of 15 · 77% of median 45 8.0
2013 666 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 65 8.0
2014 672 13th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 65 7.9
2015 668 11th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 67 8.0
2016 671 12th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 68 8.0
2017 706 14th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 68 8.0
2018 267 6th lowest of 15 · 42% of median 35 6.2
2019 721 15th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 83 8.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.