Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
ALBERT KEYES DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 5000507 · 1 · RED DIRT CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:04 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1887-05-31 — 29th most senior of the 360 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SIX DIAMOND DITCH (1887-05-18). Immediately behind: BECKER NO 2 DITCH (1887-06-30).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13665.0 | 1887-05-31 | 1906-08-11 | 1.375 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 29 |
| 31393.26814 | 1923-06-01 | 1938-07-13 | 2.225 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 158 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 164 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2009, came in at 251 AF — 153% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 319 | 13th lowest of 15 · 194% of median | 45 | 3.8 |
| 1996 | 217 | 11th lowest of 15 · 132% of median | 40 | 3.8 |
| 1997 | 169 | 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 56 | 2.0 |
| 1998 | 506 | 15th lowest of 15 · 308% of median | 73 | 4.5 |
| 1999 | 328 | 14th lowest of 15 · 200% of median | 60 | 3.5 |
| 2000 | 111 | 5th lowest of 15 · 68% of median | 52 | 1.5 |
| 2001 | 164 | 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 49 | 2.9 |
| 2002 | 29 | 1st lowest of 15 · 18% of median | 31 | 0.5 |
| 2003 | 127 | 6th lowest of 15 · 77% of median | 50 | 1.8 |
| 2004 | 47 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 29% of median | 48 | 0.5 |
| 2005 | 164 | 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 72 | 2.8 |
| 2006 | 104 | 4th lowest of 15 · 63% of median | 65 | 1.2 |
| 2007 | 61 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 37% of median | 47 | 1.2 |
| 2008 | 190 | 10th lowest of 15 · 116% of median | 49 | 3.1 |
| 2009 | 251 | 12th lowest of 15 · 153% of median | 60 | 3.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.