← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

SIX DIAMOND DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5000645 · 1 · TROUBLESOME CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:03 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1887-05-1828th most senior of the 360 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BECKER NO 5 DITCH (1887-04-21). Immediately behind: ALBERT KEYES DITCH (1887-05-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
13652.01887-05-181906-08-11 3.670.0 CIRR 28

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 414 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 419 AF — 101% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 441 10th lowest of 15 · 106% of median 57 5.7
2011 902 15th lowest of 15 · 218% of median 63 10.3
2012 322 3rd lowest of 15 · 78% of median 67 3.5
2013 414 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 56 4.3
2014 725 13th lowest of 15 · 175% of median 56 15.2
2015 357 5th lowest of 15 · 86% of median 54 4.3
2016 216 1st lowest of 15 · 52% of median 33 5.3
2017 295 2nd lowest of 15 · 71% of median 46 4.3
2018 411 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median 66 6.0
2019 355 4th lowest of 15 · 86% of median 57 5.0
2020 884 14th lowest of 15 · 214% of median 91 11.8
2021 518 12th lowest of 15 · 125% of median 85 5.5
2022 454 11th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 90 6.0
2023 372 6th lowest of 15 · 90% of median 80 3.5
2024 419 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median 79 3.5

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.