← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

DRY PARK DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5200544 · 1 · CASTLE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:12 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1887-03-207th most senior of the 562 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LAVA CREEK DITCH (1886-05-15). Immediately behind: HARTMAN DITCH (1887-04-20).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
13593.01887-03-201890-11-20 4.20.0 CIRR 7
21275.01908-04-011909-06-07 3.00.0 CIRR 86

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 619 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 1,026 AF — 166% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2008 558 7th lowest of 15 · 90% of median 115 4.1
2009 501 4th lowest of 15 · 81% of median 117 2.7
2010 529 5th lowest of 15 · 86% of median 129 5.1
2011 1,062 13th lowest of 15 · 172% of median 132 5.7
2012 274 1st lowest of 15 · 44% of median 73 2.3
2013 545 6th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 106 4.2
2014 976 11th lowest of 15 · 158% of median 108 4.6
2015 619 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 214 2.1
2016 933 9th lowest of 15 · 151% of median 204 4.9
2017 953 10th lowest of 15 · 154% of median 127 7.8
2018 308 3rd lowest of 15 · 50% of median 55 2.9
2019 1,508 15th lowest of 15 · 244% of median 119 12.4
2020 278 2nd lowest of 15 · 45% of median 116 1.8
2023 1,183 14th lowest of 15 · 191% of median 129 10.5
2024 1,026 12th lowest of 15 · 166% of median 106 6.4

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.