← My Water · Print / save as PDF
ROCK CREEK DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 5200621 · 1 · PINEY RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:58 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1891-05-01 — 46th most senior of the 562 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HEUSCHKEL NO 2 DITCH (1900-06-24). Immediately behind: BRUNER DITCH (1894-05-20).
Decreed rights (3)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19190.15096 | 1891-05-01 | 1904-03-08 | 0.3 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 43 |
| 19190.18788 | 1901-06-10 | 1904-03-08 | 0.3 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 46 |
| 29437.19518 | 1903-06-10 | 1946-08-30 | 2.91 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 126 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 112 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 49 AF — 44% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 122 | 9th lowest of 15 · 109% of median | 52 | 1.4 |
| 2001 | 136 | 11th lowest of 15 · 121% of median | 97 | 1.8 |
| 2002 | 79 | 6th lowest of 15 · 70% of median | 36 | 1.1 |
| 2011 | 249 | 14th lowest of 15 · 222% of median | 86 | 2.5 |
| 2012 | 72 | 5th lowest of 15 · 64% of median | 62 | 1.0 |
| 2013 | 173 | 13th lowest of 15 · 154% of median | 78 | 1.6 |
| 2014 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.1 |
| 2015 | 136 | 11th lowest of 15 · 121% of median | 100 | 0.9 |
| 2016 | 112 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 69 | 1.0 |
| 2017 | 47 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 42% of median | 21 | 1.2 |
| 2018 | 93 | 7th lowest of 15 · 83% of median | 54 | 1.1 |
| 2019 | 70 | 4th lowest of 15 · 62% of median | 28 | 1.3 |
| 2021 | 129 | 10th lowest of 15 · 115% of median | 64 | 1.2 |
| 2023 | 344 | 15th lowest of 15 · 307% of median | 65 | 3.2 |
| 2024 | 49 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 44% of median | 22 | 1.3 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.