← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

P B SPRING DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5200698 · 1 · SHEEPHORN CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:22 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1910-12-31346th most senior of the 562 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HINTON DITCH (1888-08-01). Immediately behind: BOLGER NO 1 SPRING (1973-07-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
46020.222791910-12-311976-12-31 0.50.0 CIRRSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 20 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2018, came in at 3 AF — 15% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2001 14 5th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 30 0.2
2003 8 2nd lowest of 15 · 40% of median 41 0.1
2004 14 5th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 70 0.1
2005 15 7th lowest of 15 · 75% of median 78 0.1
2006 11 3rd lowest of 15 · 55% of median 56 0.1
2007 11 3rd lowest of 15 · 55% of median 57 0.1
2008 33 10th lowest of 15 · 165% of median 44 0.5
2009 62 14th lowest of 15 · 310% of median 64 0.5
2010 58 12th lowest of 15 · 290% of median 76 0.5
2011 52 11th lowest of 15 · 260% of median 65 0.5
2012 20 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 76 0.2
2013 61 13th lowest of 15 · 305% of median 66 0.5
2015 83 15th lowest of 15 · 415% of median 120 0.3
2017 26 9th lowest of 15 · 130% of median 75 0.3
2018 3 1st lowest of 15 · 15% of median 77 0.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.