Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
JONES RESERVOIR
Structure dossier · WDID 5203940 · 3 · HENRY CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:38 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1937-10-05 — 186th most senior of the 562 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: COTTONW SPRING (1936-12-31). Immediately behind: WILTSEY DITCH (1938-04-18).
Decreed rights (3)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32054.0 | 1937-10-05 | 1946-08-30 | 26.41 | 0.0 | A | IRR | RES12 |
| 42242.0 | 1965-08-27 | 1972-05-31 | 42.7842 | 0.0 | A | IRRRECFISDOM | |
| 60628.0 | 2015-12-29 | 2015-12-31 | 0.0 | 69.2018 | A | IRRRECFISDOM |
Legal record & documents
3 decreed actions on record across
3 court cases:
15CW3115, CA1548, CA1038.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
15CW3115 | 1 | 2015-12-31 | S |
CA1548 | 1 | 1972-05-31 | S |
CA1038 | 1 | 1946-08-30 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 7 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 36 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 46 AF — 130% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 2 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | — | no recorded volume | 28 | 0 | — |
| 2011 | — | no recorded volume | 28 | 0 | — |
| 2012 | — | no recorded volume | 28 | 0 | — |
| 2013 | — | no recorded volume | 27 | 0 | — |
| 2020 | 25 | 1st lowest of 2 · 70% of median | — | 29 | 0.5 |
| 2022 | — | no recorded volume | 7 | 0 | — |
| 2024 | 46 | 2nd lowest of 2 · 130% of median | — | 30 | 0.8 |
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 3 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | fragment | 59 measured day(s) on file (under 180 -- a season, not a history) |
| record continuity | unknown | record too short to assess continuity (needs 2+ years of span and 180+ measured days) |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.