Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

CABIN CREEK NO 2 DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5300520 · 1 · CABIN CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:46 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1890-06-15 — 96th most senior of the 1231 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: TUCKER NO 3 DITCH (1890-05-15). Immediately behind: FREDERICK DITCH (1890-06-27).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
14776.01890-06-151890-11-20 0.60.0 CIRR 116

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 282 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2019, came in at 181 AF — 64% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2004 385 12th lowest of 15 · 136% of median 98 2.0
2005 540 13th lowest of 15 · 192% of median 137 2.0
2006 113 2nd lowest of 15 · 40% of median 58 1.0
2007 81 1st lowest of 15 · 29% of median 69 0.6
2008 137 3rd lowest of 15 · 49% of median 70 1.0
2009 196 6th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 100 1.0
2010 282 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 143 1.0
2011 292 10th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 148 1.0
2012 196 6th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 79 1.5
2013 147 4th lowest of 15 · 52% of median 84 1.0
2015 1,225 15th lowest of 15 · 434% of median 175 4.1
2016 700 14th lowest of 15 · 248% of median 112 3.3
2017 286 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median 128 1.9
2018 307 11th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 97 2.6
2019 181 5th lowest of 15 · 64% of median 91 1.8

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3550 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 37% of the irrigation seasons in 1975-2019 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.