← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

DEEMS PIPELINE DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5300548 · 1 · SWEETWATER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:45 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1954-05-17364th most senior of the 1231 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: TRANSFER PL SPRING (1954-02-06). Immediately behind: JACKSON FISH POND DITCH (1954-06-07).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
38122.01954-05-171956-02-07 0.080.0 CDOM 403

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 33 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1987, came in at 10 AF — 30% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1974 4 1st lowest of 12 · 12% of median 61 0.0
1975 70 8th lowest of 12 · 212% of median 365 0.4
1976 242 11th lowest of 12 · 733% of median 305 0.4
1977 24 5th lowest of 12 · 73% of median 275 0.0
1978 21 4th lowest of 12 · 64% of median 304 0.0
1979 42 7th lowest of 12 · 127% of median 61 0.3
1980 211 10th lowest of 12 · 639% of median 304 0.3
1981 5 2nd lowest of 12 · 15% of median 61 0.0
1982 24 5th lowest of 12 · 73% of median 304 0.0
1985 74 9th lowest of 12 · 224% of median 275 0.4
1986 271 12th lowest of 12 · 821% of median 304 0.4
1987 10 3rd lowest of 12 · 30% of median 118 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2737 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 1974-1987 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.