← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ROCK GARDEN DITCH & PL

Structure dossier · WDID 5301002 · 1 · NO NAME CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:06 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1888-08-03784th most senior of the 1231 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LAMARINE WELL (1980-12-05). Immediately behind: 5305151 (1888-08-03).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
47847.140951888-08-031981-12-31 0.50.0 CIRRMUNRECDOM
48932.01983-12-211983-12-31 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMDOM

Recorded use (last 9 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 69 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1994, came in at 28 AF — 41% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 9 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1985 180 8th lowest of 9 · 261% of median 183 0.5
1986 180 8th lowest of 9 · 261% of median 184 0.5
1987 12 1st lowest of 9 · 17% of median 184 0.1
1988 69 5th lowest of 9 · 100% of median 175 0.2
1989 72 7th lowest of 9 · 104% of median 182 0.2
1990 66 4th lowest of 9 · 96% of median 167 0.2
1991 69 5th lowest of 9 · 100% of median 176 0.2
1993 36 3rd lowest of 9 · 52% of median 93 0.2
1994 28 2nd lowest of 9 · 41% of median 59 0.3

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 2 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1403 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 69% of the irrigation seasons in 1985-1994 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.