← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

FLEMING DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5400524 · 1 · GOLD BLOSSOM CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:15 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1912-04-15129th most senior of the 724 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: GOLD BLOSSOM RES (1906-11-01). Immediately behind: BASIN DITCH (1900-08-26).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
23604.22751912-04-151914-10-05 0.20.0 CIRR 55

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 16 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2006 100 14th lowest of 15 · 625% of median 158 0.5
2007 154 15th lowest of 15 · 962% of median 170 0.5
2008 82 12th lowest of 15 · 512% of median 79 0.5
2009 93 13th lowest of 15 · 581% of median 93 0.5
2010 31 10th lowest of 15 · 194% of median 45 0.5
2011 15 7th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 16 0.5
2013 46 11th lowest of 15 · 288% of median 64 0.5
2014 28 9th lowest of 15 · 175% of median 74 0.2
2015 16 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 59 0.2
2016 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2017 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2019 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2020 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2025 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.