Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
JONS SEEP & WASTE W D 1
Structure dossier · WDID 5401044 · 1 · LITTLE SNAKE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:05 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1929-07-01 — 448th most senior of the 724 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CONGLOMERATE SPRING (1984-08-23). Immediately behind: JONS SEEP & WASTE W D 2 (1929-07-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49308.29036 | 1929-07-01 | 1985-12-31 | 3.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Legal record & documents
1 decreed actions on record across
1 court case:
85CW0097.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
85CW0097 | 1 | 1985-12-31 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 424 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2016, came in at 581 AF — 137% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 182 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 43% of median | 62 | 2.0 |
| 2003 | 428 | 10th lowest of 15 · 101% of median | 73 | 3.0 |
| 2004 | 434 | 11th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 103 | 3.5 |
| 2005 | 845 | 14th lowest of 15 · 199% of median | 143 | 3.0 |
| 2006 | 270 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 64% of median | 118 | 2.0 |
| 2007 | 173 | 1st lowest of 15 · 41% of median | 67 | 1.5 |
| 2008 | 305 | 4th lowest of 15 · 72% of median | 95 | 3.5 |
| 2009 | 352 | 5th lowest of 15 · 83% of median | 51 | 4.0 |
| 2010 | 357 | 6th lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 149 | 2.0 |
| 2011 | 403 | 7th lowest of 15 · 95% of median | 86 | 4.0 |
| 2012 | 425 | 9th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 180 | 1.5 |
| 2013 | 424 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 170 | 3.0 |
| 2014 | 678 | 13th lowest of 15 · 160% of median | 174 | 3.5 |
| 2015 | 1,202 | 15th lowest of 15 · 284% of median | 149 | 7.0 |
| 2016 | 581 | 12th lowest of 15 · 137% of median | 129 | 6.0 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use is rising over its last 15 recorded years (+25 AF/yr, Mann-Kendall p=0.038).
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 2388 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | patchy | 42% of the irrigation seasons in 1990-2016 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.