← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

OFFIELD DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5600566 · 1 · POT CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:49 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1914-04-2851st most senior of the 909 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: T W BLEVINS RES (1914-04-15). Immediately behind: AINGE WATER PL (1914-05-22).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
31579.234931914-04-281964-10-09 3.00.0 CIRRDOM 4

Recorded use (last 13 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 182 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2020, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 13 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1980 307 9th lowest of 13 · 169% of median 35 5.0
1995 393 10th lowest of 13 · 216% of median 77 3.0
1996 119 6th lowest of 13 · 65% of median 31 2.0
1997 516 12th lowest of 13 · 284% of median 124 2.5
1998 564 13th lowest of 13 · 310% of median 170 2.5
1999 440 11th lowest of 13 · 242% of median 62 4.0
2000 286 8th lowest of 13 · 157% of median 76 2.0
2001 182 7th lowest of 13 · 100% of median 24 4.0
2003 20 5th lowest of 13 · 11% of median 6 2.0
2007 0 1st lowest of 13 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2018 0 1st lowest of 13 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2019 0 1st lowest of 13 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2020 0 1st lowest of 13 · 0% of median 2 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 611 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 7% of the irrigation seasons in 1980-2020 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.