← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

EARLE IRR ALT DIV

Structure dossier · WDID 5701239 · 8 · YAMPA RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:22 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1980-04-15458th most senior of the 1003 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CAVE IN SPRING (1979-07-15). Immediately behind: EARLE IRR DIVERSION (1980-04-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
47587.01980-04-151980-12-31 0.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 164 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2023, came in at 69 AF — 42% of that, and 1st lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2006 254 8th lowest of 12 · 155% of median 21 7.1
2008 71 3rd lowest of 12 · 43% of median 6 7.1
2009 113 5th lowest of 12 · 69% of median 9 7.1
2014 446 10th lowest of 12 · 272% of median 92 2.5
2016 177 7th lowest of 12 · 108% of median 29 4.4
2017 151 6th lowest of 12 · 92% of median 28 4.0
2018 547 11th lowest of 12 · 334% of median 79 4.0
2019 309 9th lowest of 12 · 188% of median 44 4.0
2020 74 4th lowest of 12 · 45% of median 15 4.2
2021 561 12th lowest of 12 · 342% of median 75 4.0
2022 69 1st lowest of 12 · 42% of median 13 4.8
2023 69 1st lowest of 12 · 42% of median 89 0.8

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 500 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 12% of the irrigation seasons in 2006-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.