← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BAUMFALK DITCH NO. 1

Structure dossier · WDID 5800528 · 1 · BEAR RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:10 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1895-01-01638th most senior of the 3097 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: NORTH SIDE DITCH (1890-06-15). Immediately behind: ALMA M BAER FEEDER DITCH (1904-06-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
33782.164371895-01-011946-09-14 1.20.0 CIRR 283A, 283B

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 44 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 27 AF — 61% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 136 13th lowest of 15 · 309% of median 83 1.8
2012 13 2nd lowest of 15 · 30% of median 40 1.5
2013 19 3rd lowest of 15 · 43% of median 23 1.2
2014 44 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 34 1.0
2015 46 9th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 30 1.0
2016 40 7th lowest of 15 · 91% of median 28 1.0
2017 126 12th lowest of 15 · 286% of median 52 1.4
2018 24 4th lowest of 15 · 54% of median 85 1.2
2019 89 10th lowest of 15 · 202% of median 82 1.6
2020 32 6th lowest of 15 · 73% of median 21 2.6
2021 6 1st lowest of 15 · 14% of median 7 0.6
2022 148 14th lowest of 15 · 336% of median 60 1.8
2023 227 15th lowest of 15 · 516% of median 117 1.5
2024 90 11th lowest of 15 · 204% of median 71 1.2
2025 27 5th lowest of 15 · 61% of median 20 1.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.