← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

COAL CREEK DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5800589 · 1 · COAL CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:47 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1945-06-15694th most senior of the 3097 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: KAUFFMAN SPRING NO. 2 & PIPE LINE (1940-07-01). Immediately behind: ARNOLD PUMP DITCH (1945-07-14).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
35320.348641945-06-151953-03-09 8.00.0 CIRR 386

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 539 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 539 AF — 100% of that, and 8th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 4 0.0
2012 529 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median 51 8.0
2013 448 4th lowest of 15 · 83% of median 44 6.0
2014 499 5th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 56 12.5
2015 789 15th lowest of 15 · 146% of median 77 6.1
2016 603 10th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 65 6.1
2017 663 11th lowest of 15 · 123% of median 76 6.9
2018 726 13th lowest of 15 · 135% of median 113 7.0
2019 669 12th lowest of 15 · 124% of median 125 5.4
2020 515 6th lowest of 15 · 96% of median 56 8.0
2021 343 3rd lowest of 15 · 64% of median 34 6.0
2022 273 2nd lowest of 15 · 51% of median 45 4.0
2023 552 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 64 6.5
2024 762 14th lowest of 15 · 141% of median 84 8.1
2025 539 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 43 7.9

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.