Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

CROWNER RES DIST D

Structure dossier · WDID 5800598 · 1 · BEAVER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:40 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1904-09-19 — 275th most senior of the 3097 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LEE RESERVOIR (1902-11-15). Immediately behind: CROWNER RESERVOIR (1904-09-19).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
19985.01904-09-191904-09-19 1.660.0 CIRR 168

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 49 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2018, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1992 61 13th lowest of 15 · 124% of median 58 1.0
1993 59 11th lowest of 15 · 120% of median 46 1.7
1994 20 3rd lowest of 15 · 41% of median 18 1.0
1995 38 6th lowest of 15 · 78% of median 21 1.0
1996 60 12th lowest of 15 · 122% of median 35 1.5
1997 49 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 20 1.5
1998 55 10th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 45 1.5
1999 30 5th lowest of 15 · 61% of median 16 1.0
2000 24 4th lowest of 15 · 49% of median 20 0.8
2001 38 6th lowest of 15 · 78% of median 27 1.0
2003 50 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median 22 1.5
2011 119 14th lowest of 15 · 243% of median 56 1.5
2013 13 2nd lowest of 15 · 26% of median 14 0.5
2014 142 15th lowest of 15 · 290% of median 36 3.2
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 4 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2626 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 17% of the irrigation seasons in 1947-2018 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.