← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

HARVEY DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5800679 · 1 · GROUSE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 01:21 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1899-08-25474th most senior of the 3097 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BARBER DITCH (1903-06-30). Immediately behind: HARRY REHDER'S HARRISON CREEK DITCH (1905-09-25).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
21463.181341899-08-251909-06-16 1.50.0 CIRR 146AA

Recorded use (last 14 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 9 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2019, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 14 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1940 141 13th lowest of 14 · 1567% of median 49 1.8
1951 684 14th lowest of 14 · 7600% of median 168 7.2
1982 22 12th lowest of 14 · 244% of median 13 1.0
1983 12 8th lowest of 14 · 133% of median 7 1.5
1984 12 8th lowest of 14 · 133% of median 5 1.5
1985 15 10th lowest of 14 · 167% of median 6 1.5
1986 15 10th lowest of 14 · 167% of median 6 1.5
2001 1 2nd lowest of 14 · 11% of median 3 0.2
2002 1 2nd lowest of 14 · 11% of median 4 0.2
2003 3 5th lowest of 14 · 33% of median 4 0.8
2004 3 5th lowest of 14 · 33% of median 3 0.8
2006 6 7th lowest of 14 · 67% of median 2 2.9
2014 2 4th lowest of 14 · 22% of median 2 0.9
2019 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 1 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 273 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 2% of the irrigation seasons in 1940-2019 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.