← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

HIGH MESA IRRIGATING DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5800685 · 1 · NORTH HUNT CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:25 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1931-09-25602nd most senior of the 3097 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: STEVENS WELL 1 (1936-08-23). Immediately behind: MOHR DITCH (1912-07-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
31725.298521931-09-251936-11-13 5.330.0 CIRR 210B

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 142 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 468 14th lowest of 15 · 330% of median 58 4.9
2012 237 10th lowest of 15 · 167% of median 87 2.4
2013 268 11th lowest of 15 · 189% of median 54 4.0
2014 473 15th lowest of 15 · 333% of median 67 4.3
2015 407 13th lowest of 15 · 287% of median 65 7.2
2016 269 12th lowest of 15 · 189% of median 47 3.6
2017 37 4th lowest of 15 · 26% of median 11 2.0
2018 122 6th lowest of 15 · 86% of median 62 1.3
2019 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 4 0.0
2020 142 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 59 2.2
2021 65 5th lowest of 15 · 46% of median 74 0.9
2022 199 9th lowest of 15 · 140% of median 134 1.1
2023 17 3rd lowest of 15 · 12% of median 21 0.5
2024 131 7th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 67 1.9
2025 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.