← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

PALISADE DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5800813 · 1 · HUNT CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:00 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1891-05-02137th most senior of the 3097 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ANNAS DITCH (1891-05-02). Immediately behind: BRINKER CREEK DITCH (1891-05-03).

Decreed rights (3)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
15097.01891-05-021892-09-22 0.00.0 CIRR (94)106
19997.150951891-04-301905-09-18 2.50.0 CIRRDOM 105A
37688.202091905-05-011957-06-22 3.50.0 CIRR 401

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 490 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 646 AF — 132% of that, and 11th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2009 456 6th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 68 3.6
2010 490 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 57 4.6
2011 402 5th lowest of 15 · 82% of median 40 5.2
2012 462 7th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 71 4.0
2013 397 4th lowest of 15 · 81% of median 52 4.0
2015 201 2nd lowest of 15 · 41% of median 58 2.0
2016 310 3rd lowest of 15 · 63% of median 60 2.9
2018 863 14th lowest of 15 · 176% of median 149 5.7
2019 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2020 918 15th lowest of 15 · 187% of median 125 5.7
2021 503 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 87 4.2
2022 550 10th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 100 3.2
2023 698 12th lowest of 15 · 142% of median 113 3.2
2024 700 13th lowest of 15 · 143% of median 123 4.3
2025 646 11th lowest of 15 · 132% of median 82 5.6

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.