Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

PARK CITY NO. 1 MAIN LATERAL DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5800815 · 1 · FISH CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:27 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1893-07-01 — 528th most senior of the 3097 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: OSBORNE DITCH (1911-04-26). Immediately behind: FAHEY-COLE DITCH (1907-04-25).

Decreed rights (4)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
23646.158881893-07-011914-09-29 0.330.0 CIRR 123AAA
39254.202231905-05-151964-03-30 1.00.0 CMUNFIRDOM 3
44559.202231905-05-151972-12-31 1.670.0 CIRRSTK
52956.01994-12-271994-12-31 1.00.0 CIRRREC

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 82 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 76 AF — 93% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 71 5th lowest of 15 · 87% of median 134 0.5
2011 166 11th lowest of 15 · 202% of median 155 0.8
2012 82 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 115 0.5
2013 94 9th lowest of 15 · 115% of median 97 0.6
2014 177 12th lowest of 15 · 216% of median 155 0.8
2015 116 10th lowest of 15 · 142% of median 168 0.3
2016 216 13th lowest of 15 · 263% of median 167 0.8
2017 217 14th lowest of 15 · 265% of median 158 1.4
2018 217 14th lowest of 15 · 265% of median 158 1.4
2020 64 3rd lowest of 15 · 78% of median 163 0.2
2021 72 6th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 163 0.7
2022 15 1st lowest of 15 · 18% of median 54 0.2
2023 64 3rd lowest of 15 · 78% of median 162 0.2
2024 56 2nd lowest of 15 · 68% of median 143 0.2
2025 76 7th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 147 0.7

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.