← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

WALTON CREEK DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5800920 · 1 · WALTON CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:19 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1887-07-2053rd most senior of the 3097 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HOOVER JACQUES DITCH (1887-07-01). Immediately behind: OAK CREEK DITCH (1887-07-25).

Decreed rights (14)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
13715.01887-07-201892-09-22 15.00.0 CIRRALL 35
15148.01891-06-221892-09-22 0.00.0 CIRR (98)110
16699.151511891-06-251895-09-21 2.00.0 CIRRALL 109
17433.156571892-11-121898-09-23 2.670.0 CIRRALL 121
18886.141941888-11-101901-09-17 3.330.0 CIRRDOMALL 66
18898.151661891-07-101902-09-15 2.00.0 CIRRDOMALL 111
20351.165881895-06-011905-09-21 5.00.0 CIRRALL 129A
22187.221211910-07-261911-06-05 2.50.0 CIRRALL 190
23270.155231892-07-011914-06-01 1.670.0 CIRRALL 120AA
33145.304671933-06-011940-12-30 32.830.0 CIRRALL 191C
52960.366761950-06-011995-12-31 0.00.0 ARECFISSTKWLD
52960.524741993-09-011995-12-31 0.00.0 CIRRRECFISDOMSTK
53998.01997-11-031997-12-31 6.01.0 CIRRRECFISDOMSTK
55882.558222002-11-012003-12-31 2.50.0 CIRRRECFISFIRSTKWLD

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 10,307 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 10,159 AF — 99% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 11,218 12th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 365 81.5
2012 11,644 14th lowest of 15 · 113% of median 366 63.7
2013 11,800 15th lowest of 15 · 114% of median 365 67.4
2014 10,332 9th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 365 69.9
2015 7,800 2nd lowest of 15 · 76% of median 321 63.1
2016 8,104 3rd lowest of 15 · 79% of median 221 60.0
2017 10,616 10th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 259 83.2
2018 11,274 13th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 301 70.6
2019 6,195 1st lowest of 15 · 60% of median 134 58.6
2020 9,422 5th lowest of 15 · 91% of median 169 78.4
2021 10,759 11th lowest of 15 · 104% of median 262 66.8
2022 10,307 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 335 67.4
2023 8,672 4th lowest of 15 · 84% of median 235 67.4
2024 9,882 6th lowest of 15 · 96% of median 198 77.8
2025 10,159 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median 191 72.5

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.