Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

LODWICK POND OUTLET D

Structure dossier · WDID 5801616 · 1 · FISH CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:05 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1988-07-19 — 1964th most senior of the 3097 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MOOSE WILLOW POND (1987-07-15). Immediately behind: VALENTINE POND (1988-07-19).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
50769.506041988-07-191989-12-31 0.250.0 CIRRRECFISSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 38 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2018, came in at 33 AF — 87% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2000 29 1st lowest of 15 · 76% of median 160 0.2
2001 34 7th lowest of 15 · 90% of median 158 0.2
2002 30 3rd lowest of 15 · 79% of median 93 0.2
2003 29 1st lowest of 15 · 76% of median 161 0.1
2004 38 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 134 0.2
2005 33 5th lowest of 15 · 87% of median 161 0.2
2010 137 11th lowest of 15 · 360% of median 236 0.6
2011 524 15th lowest of 15 · 1379% of median 365 0.9
2012 453 14th lowest of 15 · 1192% of median 366 0.8
2013 255 13th lowest of 15 · 671% of median 304 0.5
2014 30 3rd lowest of 15 · 79% of median 61 0.2
2015 151 12th lowest of 15 · 397% of median 304 0.2
2016 83 10th lowest of 15 · 218% of median 84 0.5
2017 52 9th lowest of 15 · 137% of median 170 0.2
2018 33 5th lowest of 15 · 87% of median 82 0.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3309 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 59% of the irrigation seasons in 1992-2018 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.