← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

EGERIA DITCH EXTENSION DIVERSION POINT 3

Structure dossier · WDID 5801798 · 1 · WHIPPLE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:14 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1888-05-011428th most senior of the 3097 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: EGERIA DITCH EXTENSION DIVERSION POINT 2 (1888-05-01). Immediately behind: EGERIA DITCH EXTENSION DIVERSION POINT 1 (1888-05-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
46751.140011888-05-011978-12-31 3.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 13 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 44 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 13 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1997 161 10th lowest of 13 · 366% of median 35 3.0
1998 36 5th lowest of 13 · 82% of median 10 2.0
1999 44 7th lowest of 13 · 100% of median 17 2.0
2001 16 3rd lowest of 13 · 36% of median 9 1.0
2003 42 6th lowest of 13 · 96% of median 14 2.0
2006 7 2nd lowest of 13 · 16% of median 16 0.2
2008 22 4th lowest of 13 · 50% of median 14 1.0
2011 67 8th lowest of 13 · 152% of median 59 1.0
2012 133 9th lowest of 13 · 302% of median 68 1.0
2014 173 11th lowest of 13 · 393% of median 59 1.5
2016 202 12th lowest of 13 · 459% of median 52 2.0
2018 230 13th lowest of 13 · 523% of median 59 2.0
2025 0 1st lowest of 13 · 0% of median 1 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 413 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 7% of the irrigation seasons in 1997-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.