← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BOAT HOUSE PUMP & PIPELINE

Structure dossier · WDID 5801878 · 8 · LESTER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 05:23 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1972-06-012281st most senior of the 3097 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WRIGHTS SPRING (1971-05-07). Immediately behind: ALLEN SPRING #2 (1977-06-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
53691.447121972-06-011997-12-31 0.170.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 11 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 5 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2019, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1999 3 2nd lowest of 11 · 60% of median 16 0.2
2000 5 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 30 0.2
2001 7 10th lowest of 11 · 140% of median 40 0.2
2002 5 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 28 0.2
2003 4 4th lowest of 11 · 80% of median 26 0.2
2004 3 2nd lowest of 11 · 60% of median 20 0.2
2005 4 4th lowest of 11 · 80% of median 133 0.0
2006 5 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 32 0.2
2007 7 10th lowest of 11 · 140% of median 40 0.2
2008 5 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 28 0.2
2019 0 1st lowest of 11 · 0% of median 1 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 394 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 9% of the irrigation seasons in 1999-2019 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.