Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

NINTH STREET PUMPHOUSE

Structure dossier · WDID 5801899 · 8 · YAMPA RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:39 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1991-11-30 — 2379th most senior of the 3097 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: PETER'S POND (1991-02-15). Immediately behind: SOASH SP 10 (1994-01-01).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
54421.518331991-11-301999-12-31 1.00.0 CIRRSNO
54421.522711993-02-101999-12-31 0.781.22 CSNO

Recorded use (last 10 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 24 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2015, came in at 10 AF — 42% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 10 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1999 9 2nd lowest of 10 · 38% of median 11 0.9
2002 39 8th lowest of 10 · 162% of median 78 0.7
2003 13 4th lowest of 10 · 54% of median 60 0.7
2004 26 6th lowest of 10 · 108% of median 78 0.7
2005 35 7th lowest of 10 · 146% of median 85 0.7
2006 48 10th lowest of 10 · 200% of median 122 0.7
2007 22 5th lowest of 10 · 92% of median 111 0.7
2013 39 8th lowest of 10 · 162% of median 46 0.4
2014 6 1st lowest of 10 · 25% of median 98 0.1
2015 10 3rd lowest of 10 · 42% of median 110 0.1

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 2 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 799 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 22% of the irrigation seasons in 1999-2015 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.