← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BUTTON BEAVER DITCH 6

Structure dossier · WDID 5802669 · 1 · BEAVER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 03:01 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 2005-09-122679th most senior of the 3097 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BUTTON BEAVER DITCH 5 (2005-09-12). Immediately behind: BUTTON SPRING #1 (2005-09-12).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
56868.02005-09-122005-12-31 0.50.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 13 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 50 AF — 385% of that, and 13th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 52 14th lowest of 15 · 400% of median 58 0.5
2012 6 6th lowest of 15 · 46% of median 5 1.0
2013 24 10th lowest of 15 · 185% of median 19 1.1
2014 10 7th lowest of 15 · 77% of median 20 0.7
2015 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2016 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2017 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 7 0.1
2019 13 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 31 0.4
2020 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2021 43 12th lowest of 15 · 331% of median 20 1.7
2022 18 9th lowest of 15 · 138% of median 10 1.6
2023 30 11th lowest of 15 · 231% of median 25 0.7
2024 84 15th lowest of 15 · 646% of median 36 3.1
2025 50 13th lowest of 15 · 385% of median 31 1.7

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 395 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 10% of the irrigation seasons in 2006-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.