← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

EM DITCH NO. 2

Structure dossier · WDID 5802792 · 1 · LITTLE FISH CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:14 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 2003-10-062600th most senior of the 3097 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MCCAULLEY SPRING #3 (2003-10-06). Immediately behind: EM DITCH NO. 3 (2003-10-06).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
56161.02003-10-062003-12-31 0.50.0 CIRRRECFIS

Recorded use (last 10 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 13 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 20 AF — 154% of that, and 7th lowest of the 10 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2013 7 3rd lowest of 10 · 54% of median 9 0.5
2015 76 10th lowest of 10 · 585% of median 122 0.5
2017 8 4th lowest of 10 · 62% of median 34 0.1
2018 24 8th lowest of 10 · 185% of median 53 0.2
2019 0 1st lowest of 10 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2020 0 1st lowest of 10 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2022 31 9th lowest of 10 · 238% of median 52 0.6
2023 13 5th lowest of 10 · 100% of median 37 0.2
2024 13 5th lowest of 10 · 100% of median 45 0.3
2025 20 7th lowest of 10 · 154% of median 44 0.4

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 400 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 15% of the irrigation seasons in 2013-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.