Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
GREEGH DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 5900568 · 1 · BEAVER CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:13 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1889-05-31 — 141st most senior of the 2360 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: GUNNISON R OHIO CR IRG D (1889-03-15). Immediately behind: ISLAND WELL NO 1 (1889-06-01).
Decreed rights (4)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14396.0 | 1889-05-31 | 1906-09-14 | 1.25 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 75 |
| 27034.24941 | 1918-04-15 | 1924-05-15 | 3.83 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 262 |
| 30667.14396 | 1889-05-31 | 1941-04-29 | 3.75 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 336 |
| 30667.21319 | 1908-05-15 | 1941-04-29 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | COM | 413 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,307 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,742 AF — 133% of that, and 13th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 284 | 1st lowest of 15 · 22% of median | 34 | 5.1 |
| 2012 | 1,309 | 9th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 115 | 11.6 |
| 2013 | 1,927 | 14th lowest of 15 · 147% of median | 86 | 18.1 |
| 2014 | 1,640 | 12th lowest of 15 · 126% of median | 63 | 16.4 |
| 2015 | 435 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 33% of median | 76 | 7.0 |
| 2016 | 1,307 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 66 | 12.0 |
| 2017 | 1,260 | 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | 63 | 16.4 |
| 2018 | 726 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 56% of median | 69 | 8.8 |
| 2019 | 2,026 | 15th lowest of 15 · 155% of median | 75 | 15.6 |
| 2020 | 1,169 | 5th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | 89 | 13.3 |
| 2021 | 1,051 | 4th lowest of 15 · 80% of median | 64 | 10.9 |
| 2022 | 1,500 | 11th lowest of 15 · 115% of median | 67 | 12.0 |
| 2023 | 1,188 | 6th lowest of 15 · 91% of median | 64 | 12.0 |
| 2024 | 1,468 | 10th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 67 | 14.7 |
| 2025 | 1,742 | 13th lowest of 15 · 133% of median | 66 | 18.1 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.