← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MILTON WHITE DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 5900639 · 1 · OHIO CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:05 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1933-07-02731st most senior of the 2360 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: KUNZE DITCH (1931-07-01). Immediately behind: BIG SOAP PARK DITCH (1934-06-15).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
30667.304981933-07-021941-04-29 4.00.0 CIRR 467
56613.56562004-11-082005-12-31 0.680.0 CSTO

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 384 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 726 AF — 189% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 1,000 14th lowest of 15 · 260% of median 147 6.6
2012 308 2nd lowest of 15 · 80% of median 75 3.8
2013 1,062 15th lowest of 15 · 277% of median 181 7.0
2014 956 13th lowest of 15 · 249% of median 142 14.3
2015 369 6th lowest of 15 · 96% of median 139 2.0
2016 433 9th lowest of 15 · 113% of median 190 2.4
2017 277 1st lowest of 15 · 72% of median 136 2.3
2018 375 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median 112 5.7
2019 641 11th lowest of 15 · 167% of median 164 3.4
2020 347 3rd lowest of 15 · 90% of median 170 1.9
2021 384 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 175 2.3
2022 362 4th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 169 2.0
2023 363 5th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 167 3.4
2024 515 10th lowest of 15 · 134% of median 172 2.7
2025 726 12th lowest of 15 · 189% of median 171 5.9

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.