← My Water · Print / save as PDF
SLIDE DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 5900672 · 1 · EAST RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:26 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1890-05-26 — 154th most senior of the 2360 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CARBON DITCH (1890-05-20). Immediately behind: BEAR GULCH DITCH (1890-08-20).
Decreed rights (12)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14756.0 | 1890-05-26 | 1906-09-14 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNRECFISDOMSTK | 79 |
| 20380.0 | 1905-10-19 | 1906-09-14 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNRECFISDOMSTK | 176 |
| 22035.0 | 1910-05-01 | 1921-10-25 | 0.3 | 0.0 | C | IRRRECFISFIRSTKEVPWLD | 201 |
| 22400.0 | 1911-05-01 | 1921-10-25 | 0.45 | 0.0 | C | IRRRECFISFIRSTKEVPWLD | 202 |
| 25566.0 | 1919-12-31 | 1921-10-25 | 1.25 | 0.0 | C | IRRRECFISFIRSTKEVPWLD | 230 |
| 30667.13666 | 1887-06-01 | 1941-04-29 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 324 |
| 30667.22035 | 1910-05-01 | 1941-04-29 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRRECFISFIRSTKEVPWLD | 415 |
| 30667.25322 | 1919-05-01 | 1941-04-29 | 5.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRRECFISFIRSTKEVPWLD | 446 |
| 30667.27133 | 1924-04-15 | 1941-04-29 | 2.5 | 0.0 | C | IRRRECFISFIRSTKEVPWLD | 455 |
| 30667.27163 | 1924-05-15 | 1941-04-29 | 9.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRRECFISFIRSTKEVPWLD | 456 |
| 45263.0 | 1973-12-04 | 1973-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNRECFISDOMSTK | |
| 55882.55302 | 2001-05-30 | 2003-12-31 | 5.0 | 0.0 | C | STO |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 2,998 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 3,781 AF — 126% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 3,642 | 9th lowest of 15 · 122% of median | — | 162 | 22.5 |
| 2012 | 4,728 | 14th lowest of 15 · 158% of median | — | 191 | 29.4 |
| 2013 | 4,443 | 12th lowest of 15 · 148% of median | — | 178 | 21.3 |
| 2014 | 5,948 | 15th lowest of 15 · 198% of median | — | 171 | 26.0 |
| 2015 | 4,018 | 11th lowest of 15 · 134% of median | — | 191 | 18.6 |
| 2016 | 4,556 | 13th lowest of 15 · 152% of median | 4,308 | 167 | 21.5 |
| 2017 | 2,594 | 6th lowest of 15 · 86% of median | — | 84 | 27.2 |
| 2018 | 1,542 | 1st lowest of 15 · 51% of median | — | 118 | 9.1 |
| 2019 | 1,798 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 60% of median | — | 127 | 8.7 |
| 2020 | 2,279 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 76% of median | — | 156 | 17.0 |
| 2021 | 2,973 | 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median | — | 179 | 18.6 |
| 2022 | 2,376 | 4th lowest of 15 · 79% of median | — | 134 | 13.6 |
| 2023 | 2,570 | 5th lowest of 15 · 86% of median | — | 160 | 33.6 |
| 2024 | 2,998 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 150 | 16.2 |
| 2025 | 3,781 | 10th lowest of 15 · 126% of median | — | 144 | 21.3 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.