Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
RENAS DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 5901209 · 1 · WASHINGTON GULCH · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:27 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1901-05-20 — 1421st most senior of the 2360 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: NANCYS SPRINGS PIPELINE (1901-05-01). Immediately behind: ECCHER SPRINGS PIPELINE (1901-06-01).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47116.18767 | 1901-05-20 | 1979-12-31 | 3.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRSTK | |
| 52960.52777 | 1994-07-01 | 1995-12-31 | 3.0 | 0.0 | C | STO |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 23 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2023, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 261 | 13th lowest of 15 · 1135% of median | 99 | 2.0 |
| 2007 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 6 | 0.0 |
| 2008 | 143 | 12th lowest of 15 · 622% of median | 91 | 2.0 |
| 2009 | 13 | 7th lowest of 15 · 56% of median | 101 | 0.2 |
| 2010 | 392 | 14th lowest of 15 · 1704% of median | 71 | 6.2 |
| 2011 | 769 | 15th lowest of 15 · 3344% of median | 106 | 6.0 |
| 2013 | 23 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 148 | 0.2 |
| 2014 | 38 | 11th lowest of 15 · 165% of median | 158 | 0.2 |
| 2015 | 35 | 10th lowest of 15 · 152% of median | 152 | 0.2 |
| 2016 | 28 | 9th lowest of 15 · 122% of median | 85 | 0.4 |
| 2017 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 8 | 0.0 |
| 2018 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 2020 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2021 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2023 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.